This story was narrated by Imam Al-Bukhari (Hadith no. 3849) from ‘Amr Bin Maimun: “During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkey. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.”
Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar said in his commentary on Sahih Al-Bukhari:
“Al-Isma’ili narrated a longer version of this story with another chain of narrators in which ‘Eesa Bin Hattan narrated from ‘Amr Bin Maimun that he said:
I was in Yemen tending the sheep of my people up upon an elevation. A male monkey came with a female and laid his head on her hand. Then a smaller monkey came and beckoned towards her, so she gently slipped her hand out from under the cheek of the first monkey and followed him. He mated with her while I looked on. Then she returned and gently tried to slip her hand back under the cheek of the first monkey, but he woke up suddenly, smelled her, and cried out.
Then the monkeys gathered round and he began screaming while pointing towards her with his hand. The monkeys went all about and came back with that monkey that I recognized. They dug a pit for the two of them and stoned them both. So I had witnessed stoning being carried out by other than Adam’s descendants. ” [Fath Al-Bari 7/160]
Obviously, this narration is not the Prophet’s (peace be upon him) speech, nor that of any of his Companions(may Allah be pleased with them all). Imam Al-Bukhari only narrated what was witnessed by ‘Amr Bin Maimu, who is Al-Awdi, Abu ‘Abdullah Al-Kufi. He died in the year 74 H. He lived during the pre-Islamic ignorance and during the prophet-hood of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). He became a Muslim, but did not see the Prophet (peace be upon him). Therefore, scholars do not consider him a companion (sahabi) of the Prophet (peace be upon him). He was a mukhdharim (a person who embraced Islam during the Prophet’s lifetime but did not meet him), and one of the most senior tabi’oon (i.e. ‘followers’, those Muslims who met the Companions, but not the Prophet (peace be upon him)).
Please see his biography in Tahthib Al-Tahthib (8/11).
It is well known that it is the authentic Sunnah of the Prophet (peace be upon him) which one is required to believe in and submit to its contents. As for what a Tabi’i (follower) may narrate of his observations and experiences, they do not reach the level of the Prophet’s Sunnah in any case.
Now that we have understood that the narration is actually what a tabi’i reported about his experience, we can understand the various possibilities surrounding this report. Hence, it is also understandable that there is nothing objectionable in doubting the reality of what happened between the monkeys or saying that ‘Amr Bin Maimun wrongly assumed that the stoning among the monkeys was due to adultery. We say this because it is certain that ‘Amr did not understand the rational and logic of the monkey world. It was only his own opinion and speculation. Hence, it is possible to oppose his speculation and refuse to accept it.
Ibn Qutaibah Al-Daniwari, may Allah have Mercy have on him, said:
Those who mock the Sunnah and challenge it, say: You narrate that the monkeys stoned a female monkey who had committed adultery…
We responded to this mockery by saying: The narration of the monkeys is neither from the Prophet of Allah (peace be upon him), nor his Companions. It is only something narrated from ‘Amr Bin Maimun. It is possible that he saw the monkeys stoning a female monkey and thought that she was being stopned because of committing adultery. No one can know this except by speculating, since monkeys cannot themselves tell us. The female monkey he saw mating, it cannot be said whether she committed adultery or not. This is speculation; perhaps the scholar (‘Amr) got to know this from some evidences that we do not know. Indeed, monkeys are the most adulterous (unfaithful to their partners) of all the animals. Arabs have a proverb: “more adulterous than monkeys.” Had the monkeys not been known to be adulterous, this proverb would not have been coined. No animal resembles man in marriage and its related jealousy and possessiveness, more than monkeys. Animals too develop enmity among themselves, pounce on one another and take revenge from each other: some animals bite, claw, smash and break (the bones, body parts etc) of their enemies, while monkey stone each other with their hands which Allah created for them like man stones. Even if the monkeys stoned one of their kind not due to adultery, ‘Amr thought it was due to adultery. This is not implausible. It is also not far fand etched that ‘Amr thought it was adultery or that the stoning was a punishment for adultery, due to some proof, since as I said monkeys are the most possessive and jealous of all animals, and closest in wisdom to mankind. End Quote.
[Ta'wil Mukhtalif Al-Hadith (pp 255-256)]
Imam Ibn ‘Abdul Barr, may Allah have Mercy on him, said:
“Ascribing adultery to animals and establishment of legal punishments among them is rejected (munkar) by a group of scholars.” [Al-Istee'ab fi Ma'rifat Al-Ashab (3/1206)]
Imam al-Qurtubi said, may Allah have Mercy on him, said:
“If this narration is authentic, then Al-Bukhari reported it only to prove that that ‘Amr Bin Maimun also lived during the pre-Islamic period, without caring for what he speculated in his pre-Islamic days.” [Al-Jami' li ahkam al-Qur'an (1/442)]
Sheikh Al-Albani, may Allah have Mercy on him, said: “This narrative is mukar [rejected]. How is it possible for man to know that monkeys marry, and that their nature dictates them to protect their honor so that an unfaithful and adulterous monkey is killed? Even if we suppose that this is how things are in the monkey world, then how did ‘Amr Bin Maimun knew that the female monkey was stoned due to adultery? ” [Mukhatasir Sahih al-Bakhari by Al-Albani (2/535)]
Also, it is not impossible that this story is real and the speculation of ‘Amr is correct, since the animal world is full of wonders. Ancient Arabs used to say: “Marriage and jealousy are combined in nothing except in man and monkey,” ['Uyun Al-Akhbar by Ibn Qutaibah (page 172)]
In fact, Imam Ibn Taymiah said: “Similar things were witness by people in our times in species other than monkeys, even birds.” [Majmu' Al-Fatawa (11/545)]
Imam Ibn Hajr, may Allah have Mercy on him, said:
“Abu ‘Obaidah Ma’mar Bin al-Muthanna in his book “Kitab Al-Khail” [The Book on Horses] narrated from Al-Awza’ii that, “A colt (young horse) was being made to mate (for breeding) with his mother, but he refused. So, the mother was entered into a house and wrapped in cloth and it was once again tried to to make him copulate with his mother. This time he complied and mated with her (not recognizing her). But, when he got the scent of him mother, the young colt turned to its penis and bit it off with own teeth from its root.” So, if this is intelligence of the horse, which is farthest removed from the monkey’s intelligence, then such an incident is all the more likely to happen among monkeys.”
[Fath Al-Bari (7/161)]
Shaykh ‘Umar Al-Ashqar in his book, “Al-’Aqidah fi Allah” [Belief in Allah] (page 129) mentioned an ant that was shred to pieces by other ants due to “telling lies” to them. A man used to place grain for the ant, and it would call the other ants to help in picking it up. As soon as the other ants arrived, the man used to lift up the grain and the ants did not find any grain. When this was repeated many times by man, and each time the ants were called by that ant, they gathered around it and shred it into pieces.
We watched some video clips about animal, which would have been unbelievable, had we not seen them. In one of them, a tiger killed a female monkey and dragged it up a tree to tear it apart. When it tore the monkey, a live fetus came out of its stomach. Seeing the baby monkey, the tiger left its mother and became engrossed in taking loving care of the newborn monkey. The tiger protected the baby monkey from hyenas and took it up the tree with it!
For more wonders of the animal world, please see Dr. ‘Umar Al-Ashqar’s “Al-’aqidah fi Allah”, page 111-168.
Imam Ibn ‘Abdul Barr’s objection on calling the incident among the monkeys “adultery” and his insistence that animals are not accountable for their actions, has been answered by Imam Ibn Hajar:
“It is not necessary that an event that looks like adultery and stoning was really a case of adultery and legal punishment. He merely described it that way because it looked like these things to him. It does not necessarily mean that legal accountability is applied to animals.”
[Fath Al-Bari (7/160)]
[Translated for Islam-QA]
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 4, 2010 at 7:28 am
Leonardo
Thursday, 11 February 2010
Muslim Rapes Christian Toddler for Refusal to Convert to Islam
Christian girl aged 21/2 raped then left to die for the greater glory of Allah.
For some reason the BBC didn’t report this story, probably to avoid damaging Community Cohesion.
“Baby Neeha, at the age of 21/2, was raped by the son of her father’s employer and left to die by the roadside, he said. No one was arrested for the crime.
These horrific events took place because her father, who was Christian, refused to give in to pressure from his Muslim employer to convert to Islam,” El Shafie said.
The family went underground in Pakistan to hide from Muslim extremists who were seeking revenge for their non-conversion, he said.
“The family has lived for years in hiding and in constant fear of being discovered by the employer’s family or Islamic extremists,” El Shafie said. “We are thrilled that she’s finally in Canada.”
For those of us seeking a better understanding Islam, there are a few points to note:
The rapist wasn’t prosecuted, because according to Islamic law he hadn’t committed any crime. The ‘prophet’ Mohammed was a child-rapist, and Mohammed is the perfect man and role model for all Muslims. Also, rape is a legitimate weapon of Jihad, especially against children, as we saw in the Beslan school attack.
Not only had the rapist not committed any crime, but his action was actually commendable from the Islamic point of view, because spreading Islam (by whatever means may be necessary) is the greatest good which justifies ANY action. The system of morality (if it can be called that) in Islam is totally different from that in any other religion.
This attack also shows a common Islamic trait of getting at Christians by attacking children and other vulnerable people (as at Beslan and in the ‘Street Jihad’ intifada by young Muslim men).
No compulsion in religion
The fate of baby Neeha should make us wary of Muslims who tell us that the Koran says there should be ‘no compulsion in religion’. Yes the Koran does say that, but the statement is null and void, as the Muslim propagandists (but not the gullible infidels) very well know.
The Koran is full of contradictions, and later violent verses (such as ‘Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them’) abrogate (cancel out) the earlier peaceful ones.
The early peaceful verses were written when Mohammed was trying to recruit his fellow citizens of Mecca to join his cult. But he didn’t have much success among the people he’d grown up with, because they knew he was a nutjob.
So he moved to Medina and adopted a different strategy of recruiting criminals and psychopaths by promising them lots of rape, murder and pillage in the service of Allah. This worked perfectly and gave us the version of Islam we see in action in the world today.
Quoting abrogated parts of the Koran to deceive the infidels is one of the tactics of taqiyya (lying and deception in the cause of Islam).
As I said before, increasing the power of Islam justifies ANY action, which includes lying as well as rape, murder and anything else you can think of.
Consequently, Jens Orback is living in fluffy-bunny-land if he thinks that if we are nice to the jihadists when they’re in the minority, they’ll be nice to us when we’re in the minority.
IF YOU LOVE YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN, STOP ISLAM!
Family flees ‘horrific’ abuse
Given asylum in Canada after couple’s daughter was raped as toddler in Pakistan
By TOM GODFREY, TORONTO SUN
A seven-year-old Pakistani girl and her family have been given asylum in Canada after reports the child was raped and left to die when her Christian father refused to convert to Islam.
The identities of Baby Neeha and her family are being protected by immigration officials, said human rights lawyer Chantal Desloges and One Free World International, a church that was instrumental in getting the family here.
The family arrived in Canada on Dec. 12 after a three-year battle by organizers to spirit them out of danger in Pakistan.
They are living in the Mississauga area and will be visited next month by Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, who was so touched by the family’s plight that he doled out a ministerial permit, of which he has only issued two.
Church founder Rev. Majed El Shafie said the family of seven have been hiding from extremists in Pakistan for about three years.
Baby Neeha, at the age of 21/2, was raped by the son of her father’s employer and left to die by the roadside, he said. No one was arrested for the crime.
“These horrific events took place because her father, who was Christian, refused to give in to pressure from his Muslim employer to convert to Islam,” El Shafie said.
The family went underground in Pakistan to hide from Muslim extremists who were seeking revenge for their non-conversion, he said.
“The family has lived for years in hiding and in constant fear of being discovered by the employer’s family or Islamic extremists,” El Shafie said. “We are thrilled that she’s finally in Canada.”
Organizers said the case touched Kenney who decided to help the family.
“This case truly broke his heart and he (Kenney) considers himself lucky to have it within his powers to intervene,” Kenney’s spokesman Alykhan Velshi said yesterday. “Fortunately, they are now safely in Canada.”
Kenney found out about the family’s plight six months ago, Velshi said.
“He personally issued a special ministerial permit,” he said. “There were significant difficulties in getting them out of Pakistan.”
The family can now apply for permanent residency on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, Velshi said.
TOM.GODFREY@SUNMEDIA.CA
The ‘Prophet’ Mohammed was a dirty old pervert – old enough to be Aisha’s grandfather when he did Mufa’khathat to her.
Thighing of children
Mohammed married Ayesha when she was six, but as she was too small to consumate, he practised the sacred rite of Mufa’ Khathat (otherwise known as ‘thighing’) whereby he rubbed himself between the tops of her thighs, but did not enter, until she was nine.
When he climaxed at the end of his thighing sessions, he came all over his clothes, so he gave little Ayesha the job of washing them.
“Rub a dub dub, put my clothes in a tub”
From Bukhari
231:
Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:
I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with semen. She replied, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayer while water spots were still visible. ”
232:
Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:
I heard Sulaiman bin Yasar talking about the clothes soiled with semen. He said that ‘Aisha had said, “I used to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the prayers while water spots were still visible on them.
233:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
I used to wash the semen off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them.
What a nice job for a little girl!
Following the Perfect example from the Perfect Man
Now since Mohammed is ‘the perfect man’ and role model for all Muslims, he set a precedent which allows all Muslim men to perform Mufa’Khathat on children younger than nine, and to have full sex from nine onwards.
Ayatollah Khomeini, generally regarded as one of the leading Muslims of the twentieth century, wrote “A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister.”
Being a devout man who practised what be preached, the Ayatollah had a ‘fling’ with a four year old girl, as related in ‘Hal Ataaka Hadeeth ur-Raafidah?’ by the late Sheikh Abu Mus’abaz-Zarqaawi:
The Ayatollah Khomeini’s Fling With A Four Year Old
The Ayatollah Khomeini was the man who led the Islamic Revolution which established the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979. Khomeini died in 1989, and the current Ayatollah Khameini took over the reins of power from him at that time.
If you want to understand the depths of depravity upon which Iran is founded, you need look no further than this story:
Khomeini slept with 4-year-old girl.
An excerpt from ‘Hal Ataaka Hadeeth ur-Raafidah?’ by the late Sheikh Abu Mus’abaz-Zarqaawi
“The author of the book ‘For Allah, Then For History’ [1] mentions to us an event that took place before his very eyes, when al-Khomeini [2] was living in Iraq, and was visiting an Iranian individual by the name of Sayyid Sahib.
He says: ‘Sayyid Sahib was joyous with our visit, and we arrived at his house around the time of Dhuhr. So, he prepared for us a lavish dinner, and called some of his relatives, who came to see us, and the house became crowded in celebration of our presence.
Sayyid Sahib then requested that wespend that night at his home, to which the Imam agreed. When it was night time, we were given our supper, and the guests would take the Imam’s hand and kiss it, and they would ask him questions, with him answering their questions.
When it was time to sleep, the guests had all left, except for the inhabitants of the house. Al-Khomeini laid his eyes on a young girl who, despite being only four or five years of age, was very beautiful.
So, the Imam requested from her father, Sayyid Sahib, that he spend the night with her in order to enjoy her. Her father happily agreed, and Imam al-Khomeini spent the night with the girl in his arms, and we could hear her crying and screaming.’”
Footnotes
[1] This book was written under the alias Husayn al-Musawi, a former companion of al-Khomeini who later abandoned his previous beliefs.
[2] Ayatollah al-Khomeini was the leader of the Shee’ah Raafidah of Iran in the 1980s.
One may reasonably ask, “But Pastorius, why do you believe this story? After all, it could be a lie, couldn’t it?”
Sure, it could. But, I don’t believe it is, and here’s why:
Let me begin with a quote from a fatwa by the late and unlamented Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran.
“A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual acts such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”
You need not fear that your Muslim male baby-sitter will rape your 7-year-old daughter. If he is a good Muslim he will only sodomize her. If he does force his penis into her tiny vagina he is obligated to pay for any surgical repairs that may be required. If those repairs are deemed insufficient you may work out a financial settlement to compensate you for his trivial infraction. No big deal. Muslim boys will be Muslim boys. And, after all, she is only a girl.
Other forms of sexual abuse inflicted on children by Muslim male family members include fondling of genitals, coercing a child to fondle the abuser’s genitals, masturbation with the child as either participant or observer, oral sex, anal or vaginal penetration by penis, finger or any other object.
Another technique used by Muslim men is called “thighing”. The child’s legs are pressed together and the abuser inserts his penis between the thighs of the little boy or girl. As this was how Mohammed had sex with his wife, Aisha, from the time she was six years old the practice, of course, was approved of by Ayatollah Khomeini who in his Little Green Book asserted “It is not illegal for an adult male to ‘thigh’ or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”
Yes, indeed, you can be a good Muslim while copulating with the thighs of an infant. An Arab woman vigorously denounces this vile practice in the following video clip from Bahrain TV. Her denunciation of the “thighing” of infants and young girls comes towards the end of the interview.
This practice flourishes in Muslim countries where women are ruthlessly oppressed and normal sexual development systematically suppressed. That would include the Arab world, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Deny men wholesome and natural sexual outlets and they will find unwholesome and unnatural alternatives.
The Grand Ayatollah’s full ruling on marriage can be found here. The institution of “temporary marriage” appears to be designed to facilitate prostitution. A USA Today article tells the story.
“When it was time to sleep, the guests had all left, except for the inhabitants of the house. Al-Khomeini laid his eyes on a young girl who, despite being only four or five years of age, was very beautiful.
So, the Imam requested from her father, Sayyid Sahib, that he spend the night with her in order to enjoy her. Her father happily agreed, and Imam al-Khomeini spent the night with the girl in his arms, and we could hear her crying and screaming.’”
Khomeini’s Teachings on sex with infants and animals
Islamic Teachings on sex with infants:
“A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister.”
The complete Persian text of this saying can be found in “Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom”
Islamic Teachings on sex with animals:
“The meat of horses, mules, or donkeys is not recommended. It is strictly forbidden if the animal was sodomized while alive by a man. In that case, the animal must be taken outside the city and sold.”
Editor’s notes: I wonder if it is OK to sodomize a dead animal? What happens if the buyer brings the poor animal back into the city?
“If one commits an act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrements become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned, and the price of it paid to its owner by him who sodomized it.”
Editor’s note: The poor animal first is sodomized and then killed and burned. What an Islamic justice towards animals? Where are the animal
rights group?
“It is forbidden to consume the excrement of animals or their nasal secretions. But if such are mixed in minute proportions into other foods their consumption is not forbidden.”
“If a man (God protect him from it!) fornicates with an animal and ejaculates, ablution is necessary.”
Ayatollah Khomeini’s Religious Teachings on Marriage, Divorce and Relationships
“A woman may legally belong to a man in one of two ways; by continuing marriage or temporary marriage. In the former, the duration of the marriage need not be specified; in the latter, it must be stipulated, for example, that it is for a period of an hour, a day, a month, a year, or more.”
“A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual act such as forplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not comitted a crime, but only an infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however, is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man’s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl’s sister.”
“A father or a paternal grandfather has the right to marry off a child who is insane or has not reached puberty by acting as its representative. The child may not annul such a marriage after reaching puberty or regaining his sanity, unless the marriage is to his manifest disadvantage.”
“Any girl who is of age, that is, capable of understanding what is in her own best interest, if she wishes to get married and is a virgin, must procure the authorization of her father or paternal grandfather. The permission of her mother or brother is not required.”
“A marriage is annulled if a man finds that his wife is afflicted with one of the seven following disabilities: madness, leprosy, eczema, blindness, paralysis with aftereffects, malformation of the urinary and genital tracts or of the genital-tract and rectum through conjoining thereof, or vaginal malformation making Coitus impossible.”
“If a wife finds out after marriage that her husband is suffering from mental illness, that he is a castrate, impotent, or has had his testicles excised, she may apply for annulment of her marriage.”
“If a wife has her marriage annulled because her husband is unable to have sexual relations with her either vaginally or anally, he must pay her as damages one-half of her mehryeh (her price) specified in the marriage contract. If the husband or wife annuls the marriage for any of the above-mentioned reasons, the man owes nothing to the woman if they have had sexual relations together; if they have not, he must pay her the full amount of the dowry.”
“A Moslem woman may not marry a non-Moslem man; nor may a Moslem man marry a non-Moslem woman in continuing marriage, but he may take a Jewish or Christian woman in temporary marriage.”
“A woman who has contracted a continuing marriage does not have the right to go out of the house without her husband’s permission; she must remain at his disposal for the fulfillment of any one of his desires, and may not refuse herself to him except for a religiously valid reason. If she is totally submissive to him, the husband must provide her with her food, clothing, and lodging, whether or not he has the means to do so.”
“A woman who refuses herself to her husband is guilty, and may not demand from him food, clothing, lodging, or any later sexual relations; however, she retains the right to be paid damages if she is repudiated.”
“If a man who has married a girl who has not reached puberty possesses her sexually before her ninth birthday, inflicting traumatisms upon her, he has no right to repeat such an act with her.”
“A man who has contracted a continuing marriage may not leave his wife for so long a time as to allow her to question the validity of the marriage; however, he is not obligated to spend one night out of every four with her.”
“A husband must have sexual relations with his wife at least once in every four months.”
“A woman who has been temporarily married in exchange for a previously established dowry has no right to demand that her daily expenses be paid by her husband, even when she becomes pregnant.”
“A temporary marriage, even though only one of convenience, is nevertheless legal.”
“A man must not abstain from having sexual relations with his temporary wife for more than four months.
“If a father (or paternal grandfather) marries off his daughter (or granddaughter) in her absence without knowing for a certainty that she is alive, the marriage becomes null and void as soon as it is established that she was dead at the time of the marriage.”
“To look upon the face and hair of a girl who has not reached puberty, if it is done without intention of enjoyment thereof, and if one is not afraid of succumbing to temptation, may be tolerated. It is however recommended that one not look upon her belly or thighs, which must remain covered.”
“To look upon the faces and hands of Jewish or Christian women, if this is not done with intention of enjoyment thereof, and if one does not fear temptation, is tolerated.”
“A woman must hide her body and her hair from the eyes of men. It is highly recommended that she also hide them from those of prepubic boys, if she suspects that they may look upon her with lust.”
“If a man is called upon, for medical reasons, to look upon a woman other than his wife and to touch her body, he is permitted to do so,but if he can give such care by only looking at the body he must not touch it, and if he can give it by only touching, he must not look at it.”
“A woman who becomes pregnant as a result of adultery must not have an abortion. If a man commits adultery with an unmarried woman, and subsequently marries her, the child born of that marriage will be a bastard unless the parents can be sure it was conceived after they were married.”
“A child born of an adulterous father is legitimate.”
“The best person to breast-feed a newborn baby it its own mother. It is preferable that she not ask to be paid for such service, but that her husband pay her for it of his own free will. If the sum the mother asks for is greater than that charged by a wet nurse, the husband is free to take the child from its mother and turn it over to the wet nurse.”
“A man who repudiates his wife must be of sound mind and past the age of puberty. He must do so of his own free will and without any constraint; therefore, if the formula for divorce is spoken in jest the marriage is not annulled.”
“A woman temporarily married, say, for a month or a year, has her marriage automatically annulled at the end of that time, or at any other time when the husband releases her from the balance of her engagement. It is not necessary for this that there be any witnesses, or that the woman have had her period.”
“A woman who has not yet reached the age of nine or a menopausal woman may remarry immediately after divorce, without waiting the hundred days that are otherwise required.”
“A woman who has had her ninth birthday, or who has not yet entered menopause, must wait for three menstrual periods after her divorce before being allowed to remarry. If a woman who has not reached her ninth birthday or who has not entered menopause gets temporarily married, she must, at the end of the contract or when the husband has released her from part of it, wait two menstrual periods or forty-five days before marrying again.”
“If the father or paternal grandfather of a boy has him marry a woman for a temporary marriage, he may prematurely cancel it in the boy’s interest, even if the marriage was contracted before the boy reached the age of puberty. If, for example, a fourteen-year-old boy has been married off to a woman for a period of two years, they may return her freedom to the woman before this time has run its course; but a continuing marriage cannot be broken in this way.”
“If a man repudiates his wife without informing her of it, and continues to meet her expenses for a period of, say, a year, and at the end of that time informs her that he got a divorce a year earlier and shows her proof of it, he may require that she return to him anything he has bought or given her during that time, provided that she has not used it up or consumed it, in which case he cannot demand its return.”
“If a child dies within the mother’s womb and it is a danger to her life to leave it there, it must be extracted in the easiest way possible; it can. if need be, cut into pieces; this should be done by the woman’s husband or a midwife.”
“A woman who wishes to pursue her studies toward the end of being able to earn her living through respectable work, and who has a male teacher, may do so if she keeps her face covered and has no contact with men; but if-that is inevitable, and religious and moral tenets are thus undermined, she must give up her studies. Girls and boys who attend coeducational classes in grammar schools, high schools, universities, or other teaching establishments, and who, in order to legalize such a situation, wish to contract a temporary marriage may do so without the permission of their fathers. The same applies if the boy and girl are in love but hesitate to ask for such permission.”
(Teachings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution)
January 4, 2011 at 4:37 am
pamuk7
Addition to the critic Leo: Assuming your a Christian, maybe you could use these Bible verses, bash Christianity and leave it?
Numbers 31:17-18:
“Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.”
Deuteronomy 2:33-35:
“The LORD our God delivered him over to us and we struck him down, together with his sons and his whole army. At that time we took all his towns and completely destroyed them—men, women and children. We left no survivors. But the livestock and the plunder from the towns we had captured we carried off for ourselves.”
2 Kings 15:16:
“At that time Menahem, starting out from Tirzah, attacked Tiphsah and everyone in the city and its vicinity, because they refused to open their gates. He sacked Tiphsah and ripped open all the pregnant women.”
Hosea 13:8:
“Like a bear robbed of her cubs, I will attack them and rip them open. Like a lion I will devour them; a wild animal will tear them apart.”
Hosea 13:16:
“The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open.”
Nahum 3:10:
“Yet she was taken captive and went into exile. Her infants were dashed to pieces at the head of every street. Lots were cast for her nobles, and all her great men were put in chains.”
Psalm 137:8-9:
“O Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is he who repays you for what you have done to us- he who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.”
In case your a Catholic…
Wisdom of Solomon 18:5:
“When they had resolved to kill the infants of your holy ones, and one child had been abandoned and rescued, you in punishment took away a multitude of their children; and you destroyed them all together by a mighty flood.”
And you have the nerve to quote translation of Hadiths voided of the historical context, Arabic text, voided of the consensus of scholars and voided of other Hadiths to attack Islam, when your own book trumps your standard? Shame on you.
Deuteronomy 3:6-7:
“We completely destroyed them, as we had done with Sihon king of Heshbon, destroying every city—men, women and children. But all the livestock and the plunder from their cities we carried off for ourselves.”
July 20, 2010 at 1:25 am
jonaly balucating
its soo nice
August 16, 2010 at 2:11 pm
JJ
Ayatollah Khomeini is shia
he is not moslim u are reffering a (rafidee)
please learn more about islam before qoting from non moslims
October 15, 2010 at 8:51 am
Keen
You really did research and not sincere.Pls how about those churches who marry men to men,how bout the worst and most despicable sexual acts in the bible.Daughters drugging and raping their fathers.Killing to share prostites with who you worship.Your pastors regularly raping infants and their big erection to church members which they claim is banana.Check history and the bible and you will find:beastiality,sodomy.Lesbianism,incest you just name it,even with the dead.Surely truly your bible corrupted by the jews deserves banning.